Given the title, Wineberg's main argument is that historical thinking is not just about all the facts we can obtain to become more educated. We can be able to state a bunch of facts and statistics, but this is not history, this is not thinking because we are not even considering where we are getting this information from. Rather, historical thinking is a skill and active process. Historical thinking involves critical analysis of the sources we use to obtain our information. In this sense, we are actively thinking by examining the authority of sources that make historical claims. We can feed ourselves with knowledge, but we can see how these facts are significant when we discover how sources were written, constructed, and came to be. Wineberg is making a general claim about the evaluation sources in general, but most examples come from those of historical events because history depends a lot upon accuracy, reality, truth, and claims because we need evidence to prove events that we w...